Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Game Theoretical-Based Logistics Costs Analysis: A Review

https://doi.org/10.34306/italic.v1i1.166
Husni Teja Sukmana
University of Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic
Andree Emmanuel Widjaja
University of Pelita Harapan
Hery Juan Situmorang
University of Raharja

Corresponding Author(s) : Husni Teja Sukmana

[email protected]

International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

As the range and complexity of outsourced services for logistics increase, Logistics has evolved into a distinct commercial service. The question of how to fairly charge logistics services has grown urgent. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the academic research on the cost of logistics services employing bibliometric and analyzing the content methodologies, with a focus on the application of game theory. Using three criteria logistics situations, game models, and influencing factors, we contrast and evaluate the research. This research examines the important stakeholders and research situations in logistics pricing examine the most suitable and often utilized game models, as well as highlights the primary elements determining logistics pricing. To close the gaps in our current understanding, we offer potential study directions. The present level of evidence-based study in the area of price for logistics is thoroughly reviewed in this work, this contributes to the creation of new models. From a pricing perspective, the results of this investigation are helpful in the advancement of logistics services, as a result, logistical activities will be more economical as well as environmentally sustainable.

Keywords

Game Theory Logistics Analysis Literature Review
References
  1. U. Rahardja, Q. Aini, Y. I. Graha, and M. R. Tangkaw, “Gamification framework design of management education and development in industrial revolution 4.0,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1364, no. 1, p. 12035.
  2. E. Guustaaf, U. Rahardja, Q. Aini, H. W. Maharani, and N. A. Santoso, “Blockchain-based education project,” Aptisi Trans. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 46–61, 2021.
  3. D. Abdullah, U. Rahardja, and F. P. Oganda, “Covid-19: decentralized food supply chain management,” Syst. Rev. Pharm, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 142–152, 2021.
  4. M. Goswami, A. De, M. K. K. Habibi, and Y. Daultani, “Examining freight performance of third-party logistics providers within the automotive industry in India: An environmental sustainability perspective,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 58, no. 24, pp. 7565–7592, 2020.
  5. Ç. Karamaşa, E. Demir, S. Memiş, and S. Korucuk, Weighting the factors affecting logistics outsourcing. Infinite Study, 2020.
  6. F. P. Oganda, N. Lutfiani, Q. Aini, U. Rahardja, and A. Faturahman, “Blockchain education smart courses of massive online open course using business model canvas,” in 2020 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS), 2020, pp. 1–6.
  7. G. Zhang, X. Wang, Z. Gao, and T. Xiang, “Research on risk diffusion mechanism of logistics service supply chain in urgent scenarios,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2020, 2020.
  8. R. Widayanti, U. Rahardja, F. P. Oganda, M. Hardini, and V. T. Devana, “Students Formative Assessment Framework (Faus) Using the Blockchain,” in 2021 3rd International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS), 2021, pp. 1–6.
  9. D. Ahmad, N. Lutfiani, A. D. A. R. Ahmad, U. Rahardja, and Q. Aini, “Blockchain technology immutability framework design in e-government,” J. Adm. Publik Public Adm. J., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2021.
  10. D. Apriani, A. Williams, U. Rahardja, A. Khoirunisa, and S. Avionita, “The Use of Science Technology In Islamic Practices and Rules In The Past Now and The Future,” Int. J. Cyber IT Serv. Manag, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 48–64, 2021.
  11. M. T. Islam and N. Huda, “Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)/E-waste: A comprehensive literature review,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 137, pp. 48–75, 2018.
  12. U. Rahardja, E. P. Harahap, and S. R. Dewi, “The strategy of enhancing article citation and H-index on SINTA to improve tertiary reputation,” TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 683–692, 2019.
  13. T. Ayuninggati, E. P. Harahap, and R. Junior, “Supply Chain Management, Certificate Management at the Transportation Layer Security in Charge of Security,” Blockchain Front. Technol., vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 1–12, 2021.
  14. T. Hariguna and U. Rahardja, “The Role of E-Government Ambidexterity as the Impact of Current Technology and Public Value: An Empirical Study,” in Informatics, 2022, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 67.
  15. M. Janné and M. Rudberg, “Effects of employing third-party logistics arrangements in construction projects,” Prod. Plan. Control, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 71–83, 2022.
  16. N. Lutfiani, Q. Aini, U. Rahardja, L. Wijayanti, E. A. Nabila, and M. I. Ali, “Transformation of blockchain and opportunities for education 4.0,” Int. J. Educ. Learn., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 222–231, 2021.
  17. U. Rahardja, T. Hongsuchon, T. Hariguna, and A. Ruangkanjanases, “Understanding Impact Sustainable Intention of S-Commerce Activities: The Role of Customer Experiences, Perceived Value, and Mediation of Relationship Quality,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 20, p. 11492, 2021.
  18. F. P. Oganda, U. Rahardja, Q. Aini, M. Hardini, and A. S. Bist, “Blockchain: Visualization of the Bitcoin Formula,” PalArch’s J. Archaeol. Egypt/Egyptology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 308–321, 2020.
  19. S. Kosasi, U. Rahardja, N. Lutfiani, E. P. Harahap, and S. N. Sari, “Blockchain Technology-Emerging Research Themes Opportunities in Higher Education,” in 2022 International Conference on Science and Technology (ICOSTECH), 2022, pp. 1–8.
  20. S. K. UntungRahardja and Q. EkaPurnamaHarahap, “Authenticity of a diploma using the blockchain approach,” Int. J., vol. 9, no. 1. 2, 2020.
  21. A. S. Anwar, U. Rahardja, A. G. Prawiyogi, N. P. L. Santoso, and S. Maulana, “iLearning Model Approach in Creating Blockchain Based Higher Education Trust,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Res, vol. 6, no. 1, 2022.
  22. R. T. Naveed, T. R. Hussam Al Halbusi, S. AlAbri, F. A. M. A. Fattah, and M. U. H. Uzir, “Game theory: historical overview and synthesizing critique,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Stud., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 127–151, 2021.
  23. Y. Koca and O. M. Testik, “Solving two‐player zero sum games with fuzzy payoffs when players have different risk attitudes,” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1461–1474, 2018.
  24. I. Jon, “Reimagining the future with liminal agents: critical interdisciplinary STS as manifestos for anti-essentialist solidarities,” Cult. Theory Crit., pp. 1–18, 2022.
  25. I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions,” Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 314–324, 2020.
  26. F. Zhou, “On the Nash Equilibrium in Game Theory A Learning Report for Optimization Method Class,” 2018.
  27. L. Junhui, “Transaction Cost and the Theory of Games: The “Prisoners’ Dilemma” as an Example,” Man Econ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020.
  28. M. Małecka, “The normative decision theory in economics: A philosophy of science perspective. The case of the expected utility theory,” J. Econ. Methodol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 36–50, 2020.
  29. G. Bonino, P. Maffezioli, E. Petrovich, and P. Tripodi, “When philosophy (of science) meets formal methods: a citation analysis of early approaches between research fields,” Synthese, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. 1–47, 2022.
  30. J. M. Smith and P. Husbands, “An Interview with John Maynard Smith”.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF