AL-WAARITS: Alfabet Jurnal Wawasan Agama Risalah Islamiah, Teknologi dan Sosial is committed to maintaining the quality, integrity, and credibility of scholarly publications through a rigorous peer review process. The journal applies a Double-Blind Peer Review system involving three independent reviewers for each submitted manuscript. Reviewers play an essential role in evaluating manuscripts and providing constructive feedback to improve their academic quality.
AL-WAARITS selects reviewers based on their academic qualifications, research experience, and expertise relevant to the subject of the submitted manuscript.
Reviewer qualifications include:
AL-WAARITS implements a Double-Blind Peer Review process in which the identities of authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the evaluation process. Each manuscript is independently assessed by three qualified reviewers to support a comprehensive and balanced academic evaluation.
The review process consists of the following stages:
Reviewers are expected to provide thorough and constructive evaluations that assist the editor in making informed publication decisions and help authors improve their manuscripts.
Reviewers should provide professional assessments and recommendations that support editorial decisions and contribute to the improvement of submitted manuscripts.
Reviewers should evaluate the research objectives, originality, methodology, data analysis, findings, academic contribution, and relevance to the journal's focus and scope.
Reviewers should provide clear, specific, objective, and evidence-based comments. Feedback should help authors improve their manuscripts without including personal or inappropriate criticism.
Reviewers should identify relevant published works that have not been appropriately cited and notify the editor of substantial similarities between the submitted manuscript and other publications.
Reviewers should inform the editor of suspected plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, data falsification, inappropriate citation practices, or other potential violations of research integrity.
All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not disclose, distribute, reproduce, or discuss manuscript contents with unauthorized individuals.
Reviewers must:
Reviews must be conducted objectively, impartially, and professionally. Reviewers should assess manuscripts based on their academic and scientific merit rather than the authors' personal characteristics, institutional affiliations, nationality, gender, religious beliefs, or other personal attributes.
Personal criticism is inappropriate. All comments and recommendations must be supported by clear academic reasoning and relevant evidence.
Reviewers must disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest that could affect their ability to provide an impartial assessment. Conflicts of interest may arise from professional, financial, personal, academic, competitive, or collaborative relationships with the authors or the research being evaluated.
If a conflict of interest exists, reviewers must promptly inform the editor and decline the review assignment when impartiality cannot be maintained.
Reviewers are expected to complete their evaluations within the timeframe communicated by the editorial team. If a reviewer is unable to complete the assessment within the assigned period or lacks the necessary expertise, the editor should be notified promptly.
Reviewers should only accept assignments that they can reasonably complete within the specified timeframe.
Reviewers are expected to uphold academic integrity and comply with ethical standards throughout the peer review process.
Reviewers should report suspected plagiarism, fabricated or falsified data, duplicate publication, inappropriate citation practices, and other potential research misconduct to the editor.
Reviewers must protect the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts. Unpublished manuscripts and confidential review materials must not be uploaded to public generative AI systems or used to generate substantive peer review assessments.
Any permitted use of automated tools must not compromise manuscript confidentiality, reviewer independence, or the integrity of the evaluation process.
Each reviewer must provide an individual recommendation supported by constructive comments and an academic assessment. The available recommendations are:
All reviewer recommendations are considered by the editor. The final editorial decision remains the responsibility of the editor and is not determined solely by a numerical vote among reviewers.
The editor is responsible for making the final decision regarding manuscript acceptance, revision, or rejection. Decisions are based on the reviewers' independent reports, the manuscript's academic quality, its relevance to the journal's focus and scope, and compliance with editorial policies.
The editor may request additional revisions or further review when necessary to ensure that the manuscript meets the journal's publication standards.
AL-WAARITS values the contributions of independent reviewers in maintaining the quality and credibility of scholarly publications. Through independent evaluations, constructive feedback, confidentiality, and responsible review practices, the journal aims to ensure that published research meets appropriate academic and ethical standards.
Interested in contributing to the peer review process of AL-WAARITS? Complete the reviewer registration and upload a complete CV as a supporting document.
Register as a Reviewer →
|
|
Alfabet Jurnal Wawasan Agama Risalah Islamiah, Teknologi dan Sosial
|
