AL-WAARITS implements a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review system to ensure the quality, originality, relevance, and academic integrity of every published article. Under this system, the identities of authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process.
All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess their suitability for the journal's focus and scope, compliance with the author guidelines, manuscript completeness, writing quality, and publication ethics standards. Manuscripts that do not meet the initial requirements may be returned to the authors for improvement or rejected by the editor.
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least three independent reviewers with relevant expertise in the subject area. Reviewers evaluate the originality, academic contribution, topic relevance, methodological appropriateness, accuracy of the discussion, and clarity of the manuscript.
Upon completion of the review process, the editorial team considers the reviewers' evaluations and recommendations before making an editorial decision. Authors may be required to revise their manuscripts in accordance with the reviewers' comments and suggestions. Revised manuscripts are subsequently evaluated before a final decision is issued.
The editor examines the manuscript's suitability for the journal's focus and scope, compliance with the author guidelines, document completeness, and publication ethics standards.
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least three independent reviewers with relevant expertise.
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript's academic quality and suitability without knowing the authors' identities. Likewise, reviewers' identities are not disclosed to the authors.
Reviewers submit their comments, suggestions for improvement, and recommendations to the editor for consideration in the editorial decision-making process.
Based on the review results, the editor makes one of the following decisions:
Authors revise their manuscripts based on the reviewers' comments and recommendations and resubmit the revised versions through the journal's submission system.
The editor evaluates the revised manuscript to ensure that the required improvements have been addressed. Manuscripts that meet the journal's requirements receive a final acceptance decision and an Electronic Letter of Acceptance (E-LOA).
Accepted manuscripts proceed to final copyediting, formatting, and publication preparation in accordance with the journal's publication schedule.
| Stage | Estimated Duration |
|---|---|
| Initial Editorial Screening | 2 weeks |
| Peer Review Process | 3 weeks |
| Editorial Decision | 2 weeks |
| E-LOA and Final Publication Preparation | 1 week |
| Total Estimated Duration | 8 weeks |
Note: The estimated timeline represents the editorial process and excludes the time required for authors to complete revisions. The actual duration may vary depending on reviewer availability, manuscript complexity, the number of revision rounds, and the time taken by authors to submit their revisions. The final publication date is also subject to the AL-WAARITS publication schedule.
|
|
Alfabet Jurnal Wawasan Agama Risalah Islamiah, Teknologi dan Sosial
|
