Assessing User Satisfaction in Hadirku Through an Extended TAM Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33050/italic.v4i1.937Keywords:
Technology Acceptance Model, Online Attendance Platforms, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Service QualityAbstract
The rapid advancement of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has accelerated the transition from manual, paper based attendance systems toward digital platforms that promote efficiency and environmental sustainability through reduced paper usage. In this context, the Hadirku online attendance platform has been increasingly adopted across educational, organizational, and event
management settings. This study employs the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), extended with Service Quality, Organizational Support, and Information Security, to examine determinants of User Satisfaction and Continued Usage. A quantitative design was implemented with 200 valid respondents, and SmartPLS was used to assess construct validity and structural relationships. Reliability was strong (Cronbach’s α = 0.77–0.92), and model fit met recommended thresholds (SRMR = 0.057; NFI = 0.91). The study aims to analyze how perceived usefulness, ease of use, service quality, information security, and organizational support influence user engagement with Hadirku. Findings reveal that information security and perceived usefulness significantly predict continued usage intention, while perceived ease of use and organizational support enhance user satisfaction. Users overall reported positive experiences and strong behavioral intention to continue using the platform. This study contributes to digital transformation and Green ICT literature by providing an extended TAM framework that explains sustained engagement with online attendance systems. The results offer practical insights for platform developers and institutions seeking to optimize user trust, system reliability, and sustainable administrative practices.
References
H. G. Musa, I. Fatmawati, N. Nuryakin, and M. Suyanto, “Marketing research trends using technology acceptance model (tam): A comprehensive review of researches (2002–2022),” Cogent business & management, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2329375, 2024.
T. S. Goh, D. Jonas, B. Tjahjono, V. Agarwal, and M. Abbas, “Impact of ai on air quality monitoring systems: A structural equation modeling approach using utaut,” Sundara Advanced Research on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2025.
A. S. Mustafa and M. B. Garcia, “Theories integrated with technology acceptance model (tam) in online learning acceptance and continuance intention: A systematic review,” in 2021 1st Conference on online teaching for mobile education (OT4ME). IEEE, 2021, pp. 68–72.
L. W. Ming, J. Anderson, F. Hidayat, F. D. Yulian, and N. Septiani, “Ai as a driver of efficiency in waste management and resource recovery,” International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 128–134, 2024.
S. R. Natasia, Y. T. Wiranti, and A. Parastika, “Acceptance analysis of nuadu as e-learning platform using the technology acceptance model (tam) approach,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 197, pp. 512–520, 2022.
A. Kanivia, H. Hilda, A. Adiwijaya, M. F. Fazri, S. Maulana, and M. Hardini, “The impact of information technology support on the use of e-learning systems at university,” International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 122–132, 2024.
M. of Communication and I. of the Republic of Indonesia, “Ministerial regulation of communication and informatics number 10 of 2021 on the implementation of electronic system security,” Ministerial Regulation, 2021, regulates security standards, data protection mechanisms, and risk mitigation for electronic systems.
G. of the Republic of Indonesia, “Presidential regulation of the republic of indonesia number 95 of 2018 on electronic-based government systems,” Presidential Regulation, 2018, provides guidelines for digital governance, system integration, and improvement of administrative efficiency through electronic-based services.
A. S. Al-Adwan, N. Li, A. Al-Adwan, G. A. Abbasi, N. A. Albelbisi, and A. Habibi, “Extending the technology acceptance model (tam) to predict university students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 15 381–15 413, 2023.
R. A. Sunarjo, M. H. R. Chakim, S. Maulana, and G. Fitriani, “Management of educational institutions through information systems for enhanced efficiency and decision-making,” International Transactions on Education Technology (ITEE), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 2024.
S. Na, S. Heo, S. Han, Y. Shin, and Y. Roh, “Acceptance model of artificial intelligence (ai)-based technologies in construction firms: Applying the technology acceptance model (tam) in combination with the technology–organisation–environment (toe) framework,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 90, 2022.
R. Dana, A. Egerau, A. Roman, T. Dughi, E. Balas, R. Maier, S. Ignat, and R. Gavril, “A preliminary investigation of the technology acceptance model (tam) in early childhood education and care,” BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 518–533, 2022.
Y. Toraman and B. B. Gec¸it, “User acceptance of metaverse: an analysis for e-commerce in the framework of technology acceptance model (tam),” Sosyoekonomi, vol. 31, no. 55, pp. 85–104, 2023.
B. K. Bintoro, N. Lutfiani, D. Julianingsih et al., “Analysis of the effect of service quality on company reputation on purchase decisions for professional recruitment services,” APTISI Transactions on Management, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2023.
M. Hatta, W. N. Wahid, F. Yusuf, F. Hidayat, N. A. Santoso, and Q. Aini, “Enhancing predictive models in system development using machine learning algorithms,” International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 80–87, 2024.
M. Abou Kamar, A. Maher, I. E. Salem, and A. M. Elbaz, “Gamification impact on tourists’ prosustainability intentions: Integration of technology acceptance model (tam) and the theory of planned behaviour (tpb),” Tourism Review, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 487–504, 2024.
N. Tunjera and A. Chigona, “Improve pre-service teachers’ online learning attendance and accessibility through multiple platforms,” Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal), no. 88, pp. 21–34, 2022.
I. Chang, “Attendance and learning platforms in college course success,” Active Learning in Higher Education, p. 14697874251347189, 2025.
T. J. Jones, “Relationships between undergraduate student performance, engagement, and attendance in an online environment,” in Frontiers in Education, vol. 7. Frontiers Media SA, 2022, p. 906601.
R. Royani, S. D. Maulina, S. Sugiyono, R. W. Anugrah, and B. Callula, “Recent developments in healthcare through machine learning and artificial intelligence,” IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 86–94, 2024.
C. Lu and M. Cutumisu, “Online engagement and performance on formative assessments mediate the relationship between attendance and course performance,” International journal of educational technology in higher education, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 2, 2022.
D. Ozdemır and M. E. Ugur, “Model proposal on the determination of student attendance in distance education with face recognition technology,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2021.
R. Bajaj, A. Jibhakate, H. Chatterjee, P. Dasarwar, and P. Shobhane, “A comparative study of emerging technologies for smart attendance systems in the digital age,” in 2025 5th International Conference on Expert Clouds and Applications (ICOECA). IEEE, 2025, pp. 102–106.
A. Ardebili, A. Latifian, C. F. Aziz, R. H. BinSaeed, S. Alizadeh, and E. V. Kostyrin, “A comprehensive and systematic literature review on the employee attendance management systems based on cloud computing,” Journal of Management & Organization, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 679–696, 2023.
J. Liu, C. Wang, and X. Xiao, “Internet of things (iot) technology for the development of intelligent decision support education platform,” Scientific Programming, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 6482088, 2021.
J.-M. Romero-Rodr´ıguez, M.-S. Ram´ırez-Montoya, M. Buenestado-Fern´andez, and F. Lara-Lara, “Use of chatgpt at university as a tool for complex thinking: Students’ perceived usefulness,” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 323–339, 2023.
M. Murod, S. Anhar, D. Andayani, A. Fitriani, and G. Khanna, “Blockchain based intellectual property management enhancing security and transparency in digital entrepreneurship,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 240–251, 2025.
R. Widayanti and T. Mariyanti, “Ai dialog: Utilization, challenges, and ethics in the age of artificialintelligence,” International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2023.
N. Wilson, K. Keni, and P. H. P. Tan, “The role of perceived usefulness and perceived ease-of-use toward satisfaction and trust which influence computer consumers’ loyalty in china,” Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 262–294, 2021.
Q. Aini, P. Purwanti, R. N. Muti, E. Fletcher et al., “Developing sustainable technology through ethical ai governance models in business environments,” ADI Journal on Recent Innovation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp.145–156, 2025.
M. Oyman, D. Bal, and S. Ozer, “Extending the technology acceptance model to explain how perceived augmented reality affects consumers’ perceptions,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 128, p. 107127, 2022.
D. Robert, F. P. Oganda, A. Sutarman, W. Hidayat, and A. Fitriani, “Machine learning techniques for predicting the success of ai-enabled startups in the digital economy,” CORISINTA, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 2024.
D. Nugraheni and S. Bayastura, “Analysis of factors that influence satisfaction and usefulness for attendance system with the delone & mclean model (case study: Attendance system at diponegoro university),” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1943, no. 1. IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 012108.
J. Lv, N. Wang, Y. Ye, and W. Li, “Continuous use intention of mobile social network information service based on user behavior perception,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 3050180, 2022.
M. H. R. Chakim, A. Kho, N. P. L. Santoso, and H. Agustian, “Quality factors of intention to use in artificial intelligence-based aiku applications,” ADI Journal on Recent Innovation, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 72–85, 2023.
U. Rahardja, “Camera trap approaches using artificial intelligence and citizen science,” International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 71–83, 2022.
U. Rahardja, Q. Aini, A. S. Bist, S. Maulana, and S. Millah, “Examining the interplay of technology readiness and behavioural intentions in health detection safe entry station,” JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen), vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 125–143, 2024.
J. M. Lewohl, “Exploring student perceptions and use of face-to-face classes, technology-enhanced active
learning, and online resources,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 48, 2023.
S. Balakannan, K. Sravani, J. Jeyapriya, S. Fathima, and R. Rosini, “Ai based attendance system using machine learning,” in 2024 International Conference on Electrical Electronics and Computing Technologies (ICEECT), vol. 1. IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–4.
T. Hidayat, D. Manongga, Y. Nataliani, S. Wijono, S. Y. Prasetyo, E. Maria, U. Raharja, I. Sembiring et al., “Performance prediction using cross validation (gridsearchcv) for stunting prevalence,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Mechatronics Systems (AIMS). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6.
M. DhivyaShree, R. Vishnu Durai, and R. Pavithra, “An ai-driven model for decision support systems,” in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy. Springer, 2024, pp. 75–84.
A. Shirkande, K. Dokhe, S. Salunkhe, and R. Maral, “Ai-enabled face recognition attendance system with cloud connectivity,” International Journal of Advanced Electrical and Electronics Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 60–66, 2025.
C.-Y. Tsai, Y.-L. Tzeng, Y.-K. Teng, and T.-S. Chang, “The mediating role of technology anxiety in the impact of loneliness on technology behavioral intention among community-dwelling older adults,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 5, p. e0321144, 2025.
B. Soongpol, P. Netinant, and M. Rukhiran, “Practical sustainable software development in architectural flexibility for energy efficiency using the extended agile framework,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 13, p. 5738, 2024.
G. Zakari and L. G. Sani, “Teacher education programme and employability: Issues, challenges and the way forward,” ATBU Journal of Science, Technology and Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 108–116, 2021.
M. H. I. Bijoy, S. A. Akhi, M. A. A. Nayeem, M. M. Rahman, and M. J. Mia, “Prediction of internet user satisfaction levels in bangladesh using data mining and analysis of influential factors,” Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 926–935, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aswadi Jaya, Henry Zainarthur, Apriani Sijabat, Aulia Rahma Dina, Adam Faturahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
