Author Guidelines

Types of Papers

Original Research Articles

Original research articles present new findings from research that has not been published previously. Submissions should provide a clear research objective, an appropriate methodology, a systematic analysis, and meaningful contributions to the fields of management, education, and information technology. Manuscripts should generally contain no more than 8,000 words, excluding tables, figures, and references, although longer submissions may be considered when justified by the content.

Review Articles

Review articles provide a comprehensive examination of existing literature on a particular topic. Authors are expected to synthesize relevant studies, identify research gaps, evaluate current developments, and propose directions for future research. Submissions should demonstrate a clear analytical perspective and contribute to a deeper understanding of the selected subject.

Policy Forum

Policy forum articles provide a platform for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to discuss emerging issues, practical challenges, and policy developments related to management, education, and information technology. Contributions may address significant trends, implementation challenges, or recommendations that can inform academic research and professional practice. These manuscripts should generally range from 1,500 to 3,000 words and are subject to peer review.

The recommended structure includes an introduction to the issue, an explanation of the author's relevant expertise or perspective, and a discussion of the issue's significance for current academic, professional, or policy debates.

Notes from the Field

Notes from the field allow researchers to share experiences, observations, and challenges encountered during research activities. This format may address contextual factors, methodological difficulties, data collection procedures, ethical considerations, and practical solutions. The purpose is to encourage knowledge exchange and strengthen reflection on research practices.

Submissions should generally consist of 1,500 to 6,000 words and present a reflective account of the research experience, including methodological, ethical, empirical, or contextual issues and the approaches used to address them.

The suggested outline begins with an introduction to the research topic, followed by a description of the research methods and a detailed discussion of the principal fieldwork issues.

Methodological Engagement

Methodological engagement articles explore innovative approaches to research and the application of methods across different disciplines. Contributions may examine the integration of emerging technologies, interdisciplinary frameworks, analytical techniques, or alternative approaches to addressing complex research problems.

Submissions should generally range from 1,500 to 3,000 words and explain the methodological contribution, its relevance to existing research practices, and its potential to generate further academic inquiry.

The suggested structure includes an introduction to the research topic, an overview of relevant methodological traditions, a discussion of research challenges, and an explanation of the expected contributions and applications of the proposed approach.

Special Section

Special sections focus on selected themes or emerging topics within the scope of Jurnal MENTARI: Manajemen, Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi. They may include original research articles and review articles that contribute to a particular thematic discussion. Submissions must follow the journal's editorial requirements and undergo the applicable review process.

Reports

The Reports section presents concise and factual accounts of research activities, institutional initiatives, developments, or relevant findings. Reports should generally range from 500 to 5,000 words and provide clear, informative, and well-organized content.

Book Reviews

Book reviews evaluate recently published books, software, or audiovisual materials relevant to the journal's subject areas. Authors should provide a concise overview of the material, assess its strengths and limitations, and explain its relevance to researchers, educators, and practitioners. Submissions should generally contain 800 to 2,000 words.

Conference Reports

Conference reports summarize significant academic conferences, seminars, workshops, or related events relevant to the journal's scope. Reports should highlight the event's objectives, major discussions, important findings, and potential contributions to future research. The recommended length is approximately 1,000 to 2,000 words.

Forthcoming Meetings

Announcements of upcoming academic meetings, conferences, seminars, and workshops relevant to the journal's scope may be submitted for consideration in the journal's calendar or announcement section. Submissions should be received sufficiently in advance to allow editorial processing and publication before the scheduled event.

The availability and final classification of article types are subject to the journal's current section policies and editorial decisions.

Guidelines for Online Submission

Authors must register through the Jurnal MENTARI website before submitting a manuscript. During registration, authors should complete all required fields, particularly those marked as mandatory. Once registration is complete, authors may log in and access the online submission system.

The manuscript submission process consists of five steps:

Step 1 – Starting the Submission

Select the appropriate journal section for the manuscript. Authors must review and confirm the submission requirements and complete the submission checklist before proceeding to the next stage.

Step 2 – Uploading the Submission

Select the manuscript file using the file upload function and upload the document to the submission system. Authors should ensure that the submitted file is complete and prepared according to the journal's manuscript requirements.

Step 3 – Entering Submission Metadata

Enter the required information about the manuscript and its authors, including the names, affiliations, and contact details of all contributors. Identify the corresponding author and provide the manuscript title, abstract, and keywords in the designated fields.

Step 4 – Uploading Supplementary Files

Upload any additional documents required to support the submission, such as a cover letter, supplementary data, research instruments, or other relevant materials. Each file should be clearly identified and submitted in the appropriate format.

Step 5 – Confirming the Submission

Review all uploaded files and the information entered into the submission system. Once all details have been verified, finalize the submission by selecting the appropriate confirmation button. The corresponding author will receive a notification acknowledging receipt of the manuscript.

After submission, authors can access the online system to monitor the progress of their manuscripts throughout the editorial and peer-review processes. Authors should ensure that their contact information remains accurate so that editorial correspondence can be received without interruption.

By submitting a manuscript to Jurnal MENTARI, authors confirm that the submission complies with the journal's applicable publication, copyright, and ethical policies. Authors should consult the journal's Copyright Notice and relevant editorial policies for further information.

The Editor-in-Chief or designated editor retains the authority to determine the appropriate article category and manage the editorial process in accordance with the journal's policies.

Formatting Requirements

Manuscripts should be prepared using a word-processing application, preferably Microsoft Word. Authors are encouraged to present their work clearly and concisely, avoiding unnecessary text and overly complicated formatting.

Although the journal may allow flexibility in manuscript presentation, submissions should contain the essential elements required to communicate the research effectively. These generally include the title, abstract, keywords, introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion, conclusion, references, and any relevant tables or figures.

Where applicable, authors should include supplementary materials, datasets, videos, or other supporting files with the initial submission to facilitate the evaluation of the manuscript.

Title

The manuscript title should clearly communicate the main subject and purpose of the research. It should be specific, informative, accurate, and easy to understand. Authors should avoid unnecessary wording and uncommon abbreviations that may reduce clarity or make the article difficult to discover.

Article Structure

Manuscripts should be organized into clearly defined sections and subsections. Sections should be numbered consecutively, with subsections using a hierarchical format such as 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, and 1.2. The abstract should remain unnumbered.

This numbering system should also be applied to internal references within the manuscript. Each section or subsection should have a concise heading placed on a separate line to improve readability and navigation.

Authors' Names and Affiliations

List the full names of all authors without academic titles or professional designations. Family names should not be abbreviated, and authors should provide their names consistently throughout the manuscript.

For authors who use a single name, follow the journal's applicable author-identification requirements.

Each author's affiliation should include the relevant department or unit, faculty where applicable, institutional name, address, and country. The corresponding author should be clearly identified, together with a valid email address for editorial communication.

Where required by the journal's manuscript template, author affiliations should be indicated using superscript numerals corresponding to the relevant authors.

Abstract

The abstract should provide a concise and informative overview of the manuscript. It should introduce the research problem, explain the principal objectives and methodology, summarize the main findings, and conclude with the significance or implications of the study.

The abstract should be written clearly and independently of the main text, allowing readers to understand the essential contribution of the research without reading the entire manuscript. A maximum of 300 words is recommended.

Keywords

Authors should provide up to eight keywords that represent the main concepts, methods, and subject areas of the manuscript. Keywords should support indexing and improve the discoverability of the article.

Separate keywords using semicolons (;). For example: digital transformation; educational technology; information systems; organizational management.

Introduction

The introduction should establish the research context and explain why the topic deserves attention. A recommended length is approximately 500–1,000 words, depending on the nature and complexity of the study.

This section should introduce the broader research topic, summarize relevant literature, and identify important findings from previous studies. Authors should then explain the research gap, unresolved issues, or inconsistencies that motivate the current investigation.

The introduction should clearly state the research problem, questions, objectives, and, where appropriate, the study's expected contributions. Authors may also provide a brief overview of the manuscript's organization at the end of this section.

Materials and Methods

The materials and methods section should describe the research design, materials, data sources, instruments, procedures, and analytical techniques used in the study.

Authors should explain how the research was conducted and provide sufficient detail for readers to assess the appropriateness, reliability, and validity of the methods. A brief justification for selecting the research approach should also be included where relevant.

The methods described must be consistent with the research objectives and the findings subsequently reported.

Results

The results section should present the main findings in a clear, logical, and concise manner. Authors should emphasize the outcomes that directly address the research questions rather than reproducing every detail of the collected data.

Tables, figures, and other supporting materials may be used to communicate findings effectively. Where relevant, authors should identify notable similarities, differences, or contributions in relation to previously published research.

Discussion

The discussion interprets the findings and explains their significance in relation to the research objectives and existing literature. Rather than repeating the results, authors should examine what the findings mean, why they may have occurred, and how they contribute to current knowledge.

This section should address the following considerations:

• How do the findings respond to the research questions or objectives?

• What theoretical, practical, or methodological interpretations can be drawn from the results?

• How do the findings compare with previous studies?

• What similarities, differences, limitations, or unexpected outcomes require further explanation?

• What implications do the findings have for future research or professional practice?

The discussion may be presented separately from the results or combined into a single section, depending on the manuscript's structure and research approach.

Tables and Figures

All tables and figures must be numbered consecutively and cited in the main text, for example, Table 1 and Figure 1.

Tables

Each table should have a sequential number and a descriptive title placed above the table. Tables should be positioned appropriately within the manuscript and followed by sufficient spacing to distinguish them from the surrounding text.

Table entries should be arranged consistently and presented clearly. Single spacing may be used within tables, while additional spacing may be applied where necessary to distinguish groups of information.

Avoid vertical lines in tables. Use horizontal lines sparingly to separate the table heading, body, and closing row. Every table should be referred to in the main text and should contribute directly to the presentation or interpretation of the research.

Figures

Figures should be numbered consecutively, with the figure number and descriptive caption placed below the illustration. All figures must be clear, legible, and suitable for publication. Text, symbols, labels, and other visual elements should remain readable at the intended publication size. Both grayscale and color illustrations may be used when appropriate. Physical or printed illustrations should be digitized and submitted in a suitable electronic format that preserves their quality.

Equations

Mathematical equations should be prepared using a suitable equation editor, such as Microsoft Word Equation Editor, rather than inserted as images.

Equations should be numbered consecutively using Arabic numerals enclosed in parentheses, such as Equation (1). Place each equation number at the right-hand margin of the relevant line and ensure that all mathematical symbols are clearly defined.

Units, Abbreviations, and Symbols

Use metric units wherever appropriate and maintain consistency throughout the manuscript. Spell out abbreviations and define symbols when they first appear in the text. Subsequent occurrences may use the established abbreviations or symbols, provided that their meanings remain clear.

Conclusions

The conclusion should directly address the research objectives and summarize the principal contributions of the study. It should explain how the findings advance existing knowledge and why the research matters to the relevant academic or professional field. Avoid simply repeating the abstract or listing the results without interpretation. Instead, provide a clear statement of the study's overall contribution, potential applications, and relevant theoretical or practical implications. Authors may also identify research limitations, recommend directions for future investigation, and discuss policy or implementation implications where appropriate.

Author Contributions

For manuscripts with multiple authors, an author contribution statement should identify the role of each contributor in the research and manuscript preparation. Contributions may include conceptualization, research design, data collection, methodology, data analysis, provision of research materials, writing the original draft, and reviewing or editing the manuscript. Authors may follow the statement format below, adapting the initials and roles to reflect their actual contributions: “X.X. and Y.Y. conceived and designed the study; X.X. conducted the research; X.X. and Y.Y. analyzed the data; W.W. contributed materials or analytical tools; and Y.Y. prepared the manuscript.” Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial contributions to the reported work. All listed authors should approve the final manuscript before submission.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors must disclose any financial, professional, personal, or institutional relationships that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the research or its interpretation. If no competing interests exist, authors may include the following statement: “The authors declare no conflict of interest.” Authors must also disclose the role of funding organizations, where applicable, in the research design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, or decision to publish. If the funders had no involvement in these activities, authors may use the following statement: “The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.”

Acknowledgments

The acknowledgment section should recognize individuals, institutions, or organizations that provided meaningful assistance during the research but do not meet the criteria for authorship. Acknowledgments may include research supervisors, academic advisors, technical assistants, proofreaders, data providers, institutional partners, and funding organizations. Authors should ensure that any funding support is accurately identified.

Footnotes

Footnotes should be used only when necessary to provide supplementary explanations that would otherwise interrupt the flow of the main text. Number footnotes consecutively throughout the manuscript. Authors may use the automatic footnote function available in their word-processing software. Footnotes should not be included as entries in the reference list.

Appendix

An appendix may be included to provide additional information that supports the manuscript but is not essential to the main discussion. Examples include extended methodological explanations, supplementary analytical details, additional tables, supporting figures, and mathematical derivations. All appendices must be cited in the main text. Appendix materials should be labeled using letters, such as Appendix A, Figure A1, Figure A2, Table A1, and Table A2. Where appropriate, supplementary materials may be submitted separately according to the journal's submission requirements.

References

Authors should provide complete and consistent bibliographic information for every source cited in the manuscript. Reference entries should contain the available publication details, including author names, publication year, article or book title, journal or publisher name, volume, issue, page range, and DOI or other persistent identifier where applicable. Authors are encouraged to use the American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style and should apply the chosen style consistently throughout the manuscript. Every in-text citation must correspond to an entry in the reference list, and all listed references should be cited in the main text Authors are responsible for checking the accuracy, completeness, and accessibility of their references before submission to Jurnal MENTARI: Manajemen, Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi.