POLICY SECTION

Editorial Policies

About Our Editorial Policies

Blockchain Frontier Technology (BFRONT) is committed to maintaining high standards of academic quality, transparency, editorial independence, and publication ethics. These policies establish the principles and procedures governing manuscript evaluation, peer review, publication, access, research integrity, and editorial responsibilities.

Authors, reviewers, editors, and readers are encouraged to understand and follow the policies outlined below to support a responsible, transparent, and trustworthy scholarly publishing environment.

Access Model
Open Access
Free access to published research
Review Model
Double-Blind
Independent peer evaluation
Publication
January & July
Two issues per year

Article Publication Status

✓ Open Submissions
✓ Indexed
✓ Peer Reviewed
SECTION 01

Focus and Scope

Blockchain Frontier Technology (BFRONT) is a scholarly journal published by Pandawan Sejahtera Indonesia. The journal provides an academic platform for researchers and experts worldwide to publish original scientific contributions in blockchain technology, distributed ledger technology, system security, and emerging digital technologies. BFRONT welcomes high-quality research grounded in theoretical, experimental, computational, and applied approaches. Its scope includes blockchain architecture, security and privacy, decentralized systems, smart contracts, and the integration of blockchain with artificial intelligence and other frontier technologies.

In addition to original research articles, the journal may publish review articles, mini-reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, and commentaries, subject to its editorial scope and current submission policy. BFRONT applies a double-blind peer-review process and supports open access to scholarly knowledge. The journal also encourages research that contributes to innovation, responsible technology development, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The journal is published twice a year, in January and July.

Read Focus and Scope ↗

SECTION 02

Section Policies

BFRONT organizes its scholarly contributions according to the journal's editorial scope and manuscript categories. Each submission is evaluated based on its relevance, originality, scientific contribution, methodological quality, and compliance with publication ethics.

Editorial Assessment

The editorial team determines the suitability of each manuscript for its respective section and may decline submissions that fall outside the journal's scope or fail to meet its requirements.

Read Section Policies ↗
SECTION 03

Peer Review Process

Double-Blind Peer Review

BFRONT applies a double-blind peer-review process in which the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from one another to support an impartial, objective, and unbiased evaluation.

All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Blockchain Frontier Technology (BFRONT) are first received by the Editor-in-Chief, who assigns a Handling Editor responsible for managing the review process. The assigned editor conducts an initial editorial screening to assess the manuscript's suitability with the journal's aims and scope, compliance with submission guidelines, originality, and ethical standards. Only manuscripts that successfully pass this screening proceed to external peer review.

Manuscripts that meet the initial requirements are assigned to at least two independent experts in the relevant field through a double-blind peer-review process. Both author and reviewer identities remain anonymous during the evaluation.

Reviewer Assessment Criteria

Reviewers evaluate submitted manuscripts based on the following criteria:

  • Originality and novelty.
  • Scientific significance and contribution.
  • Methodological rigor.
  • Quality of data analysis and interpretation.
  • Clarity of presentation and organization.
  • Validity of conclusions.
  • Compliance with research and publication ethics.

Editorial Recommendations

Reviewers provide detailed comments and recommendations, including one of the following possible outcomes:

Accept Minor Revision Major Revision Reject

The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor makes the final editorial decision by considering the reviewers' recommendations while maintaining editorial independence.

Revision and Re-evaluation

For manuscripts requiring revision, authors must submit:

  • A revised manuscript addressing all reviewer comments.
  • A detailed response letter explaining how each comment has been addressed.

Revised manuscripts may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation until the editor is satisfied that all scientific and editorial concerns have been adequately resolved.

A manuscript is accepted for publication only after successfully completing the double-blind peer-review process and meeting the journal's scientific, ethical, and editorial standards. Following acceptance, the manuscript proceeds to copyediting, proofreading, DOI registration, and online publication.

Read Peer Review Policy ↗
SECTION 04

Publication Frequency

BFRONT is published Semiannual, with two issues released every year in January and July. Manuscript submissions are accepted throughout the year and may be considered for an upcoming issue, subject to editorial evaluation, peer review, and publication scheduling.

First Issue
January
Annual publication
Second Issue
July
Annual publication

Submission date: Anytime. Acceptance notification and online publication are subject to the completion of the editorial and peer-review process and the journal's publication schedule.

Read Publication Frequency ↗
SECTION 05

Open Access Statement

The Journal of Blockchain Frontier Technology (BFRONT) is a fully open-access journal. All published articles are freely available online immediately upon publication, allowing readers to access, read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full text without subscription barriers, subject to the applicable license.

BFRONT supports the principles of open scholarly communication and transparent citation practices, including the Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC). Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Creative Commons License
CC BY 4.0

This license allows users to share and adapt published material for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate attribution is given.

Share

Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.

Adapt

Remix, transform, and build upon the material.

License Conditions

Attribution

Users must provide appropriate credit, include a link to the license, and indicate whether changes have been made. Attribution must not imply endorsement by the licensor.

No Additional Restrictions

Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from exercising the permissions granted by the license.

Notices and Limitations

The license does not apply to material already in the public domain or uses permitted by applicable legal exceptions. No warranties are provided, and other rights, including privacy, publicity, and moral rights, may affect how material can be used.

View CC BY 4.0 License ↗

Read Open Access Policy ↗
SECTION 06

Archiving and Digital Preservation

BFRONT is committed to preserving the scholarly record and ensuring the long-term accessibility of its published content. The journal utilizes the LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) and CLOCKSS (Controlled Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) systems to support distributed digital preservation among participating libraries.

These systems allow participating libraries to maintain permanent archival copies of journal content for preservation, restoration, and continued access in the event that the original content becomes unavailable.

LOCKSS

Distributed digital preservation network.

Official Website ↗
CLOCKSS

Long-term digital preservation and restoration.

Official Website ↗
Read Archiving Policy ↗
SECTION 07

Publication Ethics

Journal of Blockchain Frontier Technology (BFRONT) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal committed to maintaining ethical standards throughout the scholarly publishing process. This statement defines the responsibilities and ethical conduct expected of authors, editors, editorial board members, reviewers, and the publisher.

The journal's ethical framework is informed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices and relevant principles of responsible scholarly publishing.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

Publication of scholarly articles requires integrity, accountability, transparency, and cooperation among all stakeholders involved in the editorial and review process.

Publisher and Editor Responsibilities

Publisher Responsibilities

The publisher supports the integrity of all stages of scholarly publishing and ensures that advertising, reprints, or other commercial activities do not influence editorial decisions. The publisher also supports communication with other journals and publishers when necessary.

Publication Decisions

Editors are responsible for deciding which submitted manuscripts should be published. Decisions are based on scientific validity, originality, relevance, and importance to researchers and readers, while considering the journal's policies and applicable legal requirements.

Fair Play

Manuscripts are evaluated according to their intellectual and scientific content without discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff must not disclose information about submitted manuscripts to unauthorized individuals. Manuscript information may only be shared with relevant authors, reviewers, editorial advisers, and the publisher as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts must not be used in an editor's own research without the author's explicit written consent. Editors must disclose and appropriately manage potential conflicts of interest.

Complaints Policy

BFRONT aims to address complaints promptly, fairly, and constructively. Complaints may be submitted in writing to the journal. The journal's stated procedure is to acknowledge complaints within five working days.

Duties of Reviewers

Reviewers contribute to the quality and integrity of scholarly publishing by providing independent, objective, and constructive assessments.

01. Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists editors in making informed editorial decisions and helps authors improve their manuscripts.

02. Promptness

Reviewers who feel unqualified or unable to complete a review promptly should notify the editor and withdraw from the process.

03. Confidentiality

Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and must not be shared or discussed with unauthorized parties.

04. Standards of Objectivity

Reviews must be objective, supported by clear arguments, and free from personal criticism of the authors.

05. Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited and report substantial similarities or overlaps with other known publications.

06. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must maintain confidentiality and disclose conflicts arising from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with authors, institutions, or organizations involved in the manuscript.

Duties of Authors

01. Reporting Standards

Authors of original research must present accurate accounts of their work and objective discussions of its significance. Research data must be represented accurately, and sufficient detail must be provided to support replication where applicable.

02. Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked to provide supporting raw data for editorial assessment and should retain research data for a reasonable period after publication.

03. Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that their work is original. Any use of the work or words of others must be appropriately cited or quoted.

04. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

Authors should not submit or publish substantially the same manuscript in multiple journals simultaneously. Concurrent submission of the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable.

05. Acknowledgment of Sources

Authors must appropriately acknowledge the contributions and publications that have influenced their research.

06. Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. All co-authors must approve the final manuscript and agree to its submission.

07. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Authors must disclose financial and other substantive conflicts of interest that could influence the research or its interpretation. All sources of financial support must also be acknowledged.

08. Fundamental Errors in Published Works

Authors who discover significant errors or inaccuracies in their published work must promptly notify the editor or publisher and cooperate in issuing corrections or retractions where necessary.

Read Full Publication Ethics Policy ↗

SECTION 08

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Policies

BFRONT recognizes that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and AI-assisted technologies, including but not limited to ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek, Perplexity AI, and similar tools, can support scholarly communication when used responsibly.

This policy establishes the principles governing the ethical, transparent, and responsible use of GenAI throughout the editorial and publication process. It applies to authors, editors, reviewers, and editorial staff involved in manuscripts submitted to BFRONT.

Core Principles

Transparency, human accountability, confidentiality, and responsible use of AI-assisted technologies are fundamental to the journal's GenAI policy.

Read Generative AI Policy ↗
SECTION 09

Editorial and Editing Process

BFRONT maintains editorial and publication procedures to ensure that manuscripts are handled consistently, professionally, and in accordance with the journal's quality standards. The editorial process includes manuscript screening, peer review, editorial decisions, revisions, copyediting, proofreading, and publication preparation.

01. Manuscript Submission

Authors submit manuscripts through the official journal submission system.

02. Initial Editorial Screening

The editor checks scope, completeness, originality, and ethical compliance.

03. External Peer Review

Eligible manuscripts are evaluated by independent reviewers under a double-blind process.

04. Editorial Decision

The editor communicates the decision and reviewer comments to the authors.

05. Revision and Editing

Authors revise their manuscripts, followed by editorial and language checks where applicable.

06. Final Publication

Accepted manuscripts proceed to final production, DOI registration, and online publication.

Read Editorial Policies ↗
SECTION 10

Indexing and Abstracting

Journal of Blockchain Frontier Technology (BFRONT) has registered ISSN numbers as follows:

Print ISSN
2808-0831
Online ISSN
2808-0009

BFRONT Journal Indexing and Discovery Services

ISSN Neliti Indonesia OneSearch Crossref Dimensions GARUDA ISSN Portal ORCID
View Indexing Information ↗
SECTION 11

Screening for Plagiarism

All manuscripts submitted to BFRONT are subject to plagiarism screening as part of the journal's efforts to maintain originality, academic integrity, and responsible publication practices.

Similarity Threshold
20%

Maximum similarity threshold stated in the journal's screening policy, subject to editorial assessment.

The similarity report is evaluated by the editorial team. Similarity scores are not treated as the sole indicator of plagiarism; editors also consider the nature, source, context, and proper attribution of matching text.

Plagiarism Screening Tool

Plagiarism Screening Application
Read Plagiarism Policy ↗
SECTION 12

Self-Archiving of Papers Published Open Access

Authors publishing open-access articles in BFRONT are encouraged to deposit the final published PDF in their institutional repository or an appropriate subject repository upon publication, in accordance with the applicable licensing terms.

Authors should provide a link from the deposited version to the official URL of the published article on the journal's website. This practice helps preserve the integrity and authenticity of the scholarly record and clearly identifies the version of record published by BFRONT.

Recommended Practice

Always include the original article URL and appropriate attribution when depositing or sharing the published manuscript.

Read Self-Archiving Policy ↗